There’s a phrase I’ve picked up recently that explains a lot of what feels broken in our “dialogue” about policy and the future. Whether it’s in real life or on social media.
It’s called recreational misery.
Once you know it, you start noticing it everywhere — online, yes, but also in town halls, planning meetings, and frankly, everywhere else. It describes a mindset where the goal isn’t solving a problem or improving a system, but performing outrage for the sake of moral superiority. And it’s doing real damage to our ability to create positive change in nearly every community.
Recreational misery thrives on assuming the worst. Someone shares a modest success, a proposal, or even a neutral observation, and the response is immediate suspicion. Who’s being harmed? Who’s benefiting unfairly? What bad intent is hiding behind the words?
These aren’t bad questions in themselves, but in this context they’re rarely asked to improve outcomes. They’re asked to score points. Politics as a performance, if you will.
The objective isn’t accountability or to build more robust policy — it’s something else entirely.
You can see this play out clearly in local government. A project comes forward, and before anyone asks about affordability, infrastructure, or actual neighborhood impact, the conversation jumps straight to worst-case scenarios. Displacement is assumed. Motives are questioned. “Community character” becomes a catch-all indictment. The project is treated as guilty of harm before the first question is answered. After a few rounds of this, people stop showing up. Not because they don’t care, but because they don’t want to be treated like villains for participating.
This whole concept came to life for me after writing about moving elections a couple weeks ago — and having some conversations with folks who agree and disagree. There were people on both sides who had this energy baked into their reasoning for feeling the way they do. And that’s not an environment where people will want to be involved.
The cost of recreational misery is real. It drives away good-faith actors. People who might serve on boards, bring forward ideas, or help carry projects across the finish line. I’ve heard it over and over again from people who broadly agree with goals but want nothing to do with the culture surrounding them.
If the goal is progress — almost anything that carries the cause further is positive. Movements don’t grow their popularity by making misery the price of admission. Communities don’t solve problems by treating every imperfect proposal as evidence of moral failure.
At the local level — where turnout is thin, leadership pipelines are shallow, and the work is unglamorous — this dynamic is 100% destructive.
This isn’t an argument against accountability, or against talking honestly about harm, privilege, unintended consequences, etc. Those conversations matter. But there’s a big difference between critique and misery-at-any-cost. Responsible critique asks questions and leaves room for improvement. Recreational misery fills every gap with the most cynical possible interpretation and treats correction as capitulation.
Upstate New York has no shortage of real challenges: Housing shortages, aging infrastructure, public safety strains, energy constraints, population loss. Anyone who claims to care about those issues has a responsibility to advocate for solutions in ways that don’t actively repel the people needed to implement them.
Outrage is easy. Governing is hard. Reconciliation, compromise, and persistence are harder yet.
The irony is that recreational misery feels righteous in the moment but produces the opposite of its stated goals. It doesn’t protect vulnerable people. It doesn’t build durable coalitions. It doesn’t fix broken systems. It just creates a hostile environment where fewer people are willing to engage at all.
Communities don’t get better through constant scolding. They get better when people are allowed to participate without being assumed to be bad faith actors from the jump.
If we actually want progress instead of performance, that distinction matters more than ever.
Thanks for reading In Focus! New columns drop every Sunday, so share it with a friend or subscribe by dropping your email below to never miss another!
